A lot at stake for immigrant rights on Nov. 2

The Republican Party is spouting vile hatred for immigrants, especially those who have dark skin but don't have papers. The punditry would have us believe that supporting rights for immigrants is "political suicide" in this election year.

One hundred and three members of the House of Representatives, all Democrats, are signed on as cosponsors of HR 4321, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform ASAP bill, whose chief sponsor is Congressman Solomon Ortiz, D-TX, and which is supported by most of organized labor and immigrants' rights organizations. You can look up this or any other bill in Congress at 

By sticking their necks out for immigration reform, have these 103 valiant souls committed "political suicide?"

A good resource for following these things is the Cook Political Report.  It rates all the House, Senate and gubernatorial candidates in terms of the probability of winning their elections. Look at the "Competitive House Race Chart" on that website, and you will see that of currently Democratic seats that are likely to be lost to Republicans (in Cook's "Lean Republican" and "Likely Republican" columns) there is not one single seat that now belongs to one of the cosponsors of HR 4321. There are a total of 5 Democrats in the "Likely Republican" column, and 17 in the "Lean Republican" columns.

If you look at current Democrat held seats rated by Cook as toss-ups (could as easily go either to the Democrat or the Republican), you will see that only two of the cosponsors of HR 4321 are in this category: John Salazar, of Colorado's 3rd District, and Ciro Rodriguez, of Texas' 23rd District. This is out of 38 Democrats in that category.

In the "Lean Democratic" column, which means the Democrat is slightly favored but by no means secure, there are three seats: Those of Ed Perlmutter of Colorado's 7th District, Martin Heinrich in New Mexico's 1st District, and Kennedy's open seat in Rhode Island's 1st District. This is out of 30 Democratic seats in that column.

Finally, there is the "Likely Democratic" column. These are seats that will probably go to the Democrat, but special circumstances could change that. This column is more populated with bigger names in the immigrants' rights struggle: Raul Grijalva of Arizona's 7th District, Chellie Pingree of Maine's 1st District, Barney Frank of Massachusetts' 4th District, Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico's 7th District and Solomon Ortiz (the bill's main sponsor) of Texas' 27th District.

All the rest of the bill's cosponsors, 93 in all (five of whom are non-voting representatives of U.S. territories, so let's say 88) are considered to be occupying safe seats. In other words that's eighty-eight safe seats to 10 that are likely or leaning Republican, toss-ups, or likely or leaning Democratic. And many Democrats who have avoided the issue of immigrants' rights like the plague are doing poorly.

Now, we can't jump to the conclusion that Democrats who are doing poorly are suffering for their poor record on immigrants' rights, and those who are doing well are being rewarded for their support for immigrants' rights. A lot depends on, for example, the demographics and ideological makeup of the inhabitants of the congressional district in question, and the state of the political debate on many other issues. In Virginia where I live, the two Democratic Congressmen who are co sponsoring HR 4321, James Moran, 8th District, and Bobby Scott, 3rd District, would probably have safe seats anyway, as they represent multiracial and multiethnic urban concentrations with a strong working class presence. And some of the Democrats in conservative areas would be in trouble no matter what their position on immigration was.

But we can conclude that the issue is not necessarily a career killer for those politicians who have a good record and a well organized electoral operation. Taking a principled stand might lose you some votes, but it will likely win you others.

Come what may, it is extremely important for the immigrants' rights movement that any Republican gains be kept to a minimum or stopped, and that they not be allowed to take over either the House or the Senate. If that happens, the door will be opened to the advancement of all kinds of anti-immigrant legislation, which has not advanced under the present Congress. Although pro-immigrant legislation has also not succeeded over the last couple of years, a Republican takeover of the leadership and committee chairmanships of House and Senate would stop any advancement of immigrant friendly legislation.

It is also very important, as a practical matter and also one of honor, that those members of Congress who have worked hard for immigration reform, such as Grijalva of Arizona, receive maximum support.


Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • The ICE (immigration cops) themselves say there are 10.8 million undocumented immigrants in this country. The Pew Hispanic Center and others provide a similar guestemate. Nobody knows the exact figure, but the 30 million figure is surely an exaggeration.
    I agree with Sean that amnesty/legalization is the only short term solution. But there need to be more policy changes, in two fields:

    1. Rationalize the issuance of visas so that people can come in legally if they have a desperate need, and are not forced to risk their lives coming over illegally,whether through the Sonora Desert between the US and Mexico, or the Mona Passage between the Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico, or however.

    2. Change US trade policies so that we stop forcing people in other countries out of their jobs. "Free trade" is a scam in which rich countries (the US, UK, European Union countries) are allowed to dump taxpayer subsidized commodities on the markets of poor countries, driving farmers and others in the poor countries completely out of the market, and poor countries are not allowed to subsidize their own farmers. This is NAFTA which has driven millions of Mexicans off the land, with nowhere to go except across the border. This is US policy toward Haiti, which was forced to eliminate its tariffs on imported rice. Then the US flooded Haiti with taxpayer subsidize rice, driving thousands of farm people off the land and into the slums of Port au Prince. This is the World Trade Organization's policy toward many commidities, in which big corporations based in wealthy countries are favored over small farmers in poor countries when it comes to trade.

    Posted by Emile Schepers, 11/06/2010 10:14pm (5 years ago)

  • Where did you get the 30 million number? Amnesty is the only solution to the immigration crisis. Its impossible to remove the millions of immigrants who are here illegally and legalizing them, would make it easier for them to join unions with native born workers, and make it harder for employers to pay substandard wages to immigrant workers. Amnesty is a lot better, then building a fence across the border or militarizing the border.

    Posted by Sean Mulligan, 11/01/2010 11:00pm (5 years ago)

  • This Democrat will vote for anyone with an R after their name because of the Dm's push for AMNESTY. Is it too much to ask them to wait until there are enough jobs for Americans before they plan to dump another 30 million illegal aliens into the declining job pool? They just don't get it!!!

    Posted by Doris D, 10/26/2010 6:33pm (5 years ago)


    Posted by JOHN ORTEGA, 10/26/2010 1:11am (5 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments