A program to address the economic crisis

Editor's note: Excerpted from report to CPUSA National Committee November 13,

Only direct and indirect government intervention to stimulate and restructure the economy along democratic lines stands a chance of lifting the working class and nation out of the present and persistent economic morass.

The elements of such an intervention could include:

* Assist democratically elected municipal and regional authorities to plan and organize major projects;

* Channel investment dollars to small and medium sized businesses, worker/community cooperatives, and financially starved state and local governments;

* Adopt an industrial policy that will renew and convert to new uses our nation's manufacturing sector;

* De-militarize and go over to peacetime production;

* Facilitate the formation of cooperative owned plants and workplaces, which the steelworkers are currently exploring;

* Initiate massive public works jobs for infrastructure development, environmental cleanup, and green industries, ranging from power turbines to windmills to non-polluting public transportation systems;

* Democratize the Federal Reserve system;

* Insist on the passage of EFCA and other legislation to enhance the rights and conditions of workers and communities;

* Review trade pacts, such as NAFTA, CAFTA, and others;

* Restructure global economic institutions or construct new ones that take into account the new economic and political circumstances on a global level;

* Reduce the work day with no cut in pay; raise the minimum wage; and apply consistent and robust affirmative action hiring guidelines;

* Tax capital movements, especially short-term movements that are so destabilizing to the economies of many countries;

* Shift taxes to the wealthiest individuals and corporations;

* Reform the financial sector and turn the "too big to fail" banks into public utilities under democratic control. (Many of the regulatory proposals already under consideration are positive, but some of the sticky issues like democratic control over the Federal Reserve Bank, the hyper concentration of the banking system, the future of hedge funds and equity firms, the loopholes in derivative trading, etc, are not part of the conversation. Nor is the placing of the "too big to fail" banks under public democratic control a consideration.)

The likelihood of passage of the above measures has little to do with their feasibility; it hinges by and large on the ability of working people and their allies to frame the national conversation and win active popular majorities for them.

In the 1930s, the Great Depression convinced millions of people that the old model of unrestrained capitalism was bankrupt. But it was only in the course of fierce battles that significant democratic reforms were passed.

As a result, a new set of institutions, rules, and legislation - a new model of governance, the New Deal - took deep root in our nation's political economy and psychology.

What was missing, however, was an adequate stimulus and investment frontier to revive the economy. The Roosevelt administration was going in that direction, but under pressure changed course in the name of budget balancing (sound familiar) and the economic recovery stalled. And it wasn't until the war mobilization that included government borrowing, industrial conversion, and national planning that that the economy fully recovered and a sustained expansion, lasting for roughly three decades, began.

Much the same combination of restructuring and re-inflating the economy, albeit in a very different circumstances, is necessary again. So far the administration has junked some of the economic assumptions and practices of neoliberalism, but much more needs to be done to re-inflate, restructure, and democratize the economy, to lift it onto a dynamic growth path. But as mentioned earlier, a full recovery and sustained growth could be an elusive goal, because economic conditions are so very different than were at the close of WW II.

In any event, the struggle for radical reforms and a new model of governance is imperative. While neither will resolve the contradictions (and its main contradiction between private appropriation and socialized production) and crisis tendencies of capitalism, both will mitigate capitalism's impact on the conditions of life and work of working people.

Furthermore, in struggles for radical democratic restructuring the working class and its allies not only come up against the insufficiencies of capitalism, but also gain the experience, desire, and unity to transform themselves and society.

 

Jobs and immediate relief

A starting point is the struggle for immediate relief for victims of the economic crisis. The accent should be on action -to provide unemployment benefits to every job seeker, to open livable homeless shelters and more food pantries, to prevent evictions, to support collective bargaining and strikes, to create jobs, to build health care clinics, schools, and public and cooperative housing, to halt utility cut offs, and to aid decimated cities. Some of this is happening, but much more needs to be done.

Such actions, led by the victims of the crisis as well as mass leaders and activists in unions, churches, neighborhood and ethnic organizations, block clubs, and social groups, are the roar from below that will give an urgency to the legislative process above.

No one should be overwhelmed by the scope of the problems, or held back by the idea that mass action has to mean thousands of people. Mass is a relative term.

The labor movement can play a special role. Ditto for the churches.

Special attention should be given to the struggle for multi-racial, multi-national unity and equality - the struggle for the latter is a condition for the former.

Recently, the AFL-CIO, NAACP, National Council of La Raza, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights and the Center for Community Change rolled out a proposal for a jobs and infrastructure program. It includes five critical points:

1. Extend the lifeline for jobless workers.

2. Rebuild America's schools, roads and energy systems.

3. Increase aid to state and local governments to maintain vital services.

4. Fund jobs in our communities.

5. Put TARP funds to work for Main Street.

The campaign for such a program can become a channel for millions of people - unemployed and employed - to become participants in the jobs struggle. It can turn frustration, isolation, and despair into action, community, and hope. And it can be a yardstick by which to measure candidates in the 2010 election.

And it can also help to strip from the extreme right their claim to be "fighting for ordinary Americans."

This campaign should be the bread and butter of every people's organization. No one should sit it out. While the intended effect is economic - to create jobs - it will also have a political effect, deepening, broadening, and energizing the people's movement and in so doing, shaking up Washington.

 

 

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • As I read through these articles and threads I find many contradictory and misleading statements.

    In the 1930s many mass organizations really worked with the CPUSA. When the mass organizations wouldn't work in coalition the CPUSA helped to initiate and create mass organizations responsive to the concerns and problems of the people that would work in coalition. Often members and friends got involved in the mass organizations to challenge the anti-democratic positions of the mass organizations. This was most notable in the case of the unions and civil rights organizations.

    I work as a paralegal and my expertise is in the area of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. In reading through the U.S. Supreme Court rulings there are many involving anti-communism where one quickly finds Communists and their friends were completely involved in unions and civil rights organizations.

    If we look at just this one statement from the report above by Sam Webb, "* Reduce the work day with no cut in pay; raise the minimum wage; and apply consistent and robust affirmative action hiring guidelines;" we have to ask, "Where are the initiatives to go along with the words on any of this?"

    Where are the articles in the PW to spark action around these basic questions?

    What should the work day be reduced to?

    Should the minimum wage be raised another 10 cents or brought in line with a real living wage? How should the minimum wage be calculated? Do we settle for a minimum wage in line with what those who have called for us to support of the Democrats' health legislation because this is political reality? Or do we through our movements create political reality? If Sam Webb is willing to accept the Democrats' legislation on health care reform because it is the best deal politically possible what is he willing to settle for when it comes to a minimum wage or on any of these other issues he brings up in his report here?

    Why isn't affirmative action being enforced on publicly funded projects? Why aren't any of these organizations mentioned- AFL-CIO, NAACP, National Council of La Raza, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights and the Center for Community Change- calling on Obama to enforce affirmative action after all of their heady talk about fighting racism by voting for Barack Obama only to find neither they nor Obama are willing to push enforcement of affirmative action? Affirmative action in employment is the main way to fight racism especially when unemployment in minority communities is more than triple the average.

    As an African-American woman I am deeply disturbed none of these organizations or the leadership of the CPUSA have pushed and prodded Barack Obama to enforce affirmative action.

    I voted for Barack Obama. Never again. I'm not the first person to say this in recent weeks and I am sure I won't be the last.

    An avid reader and friend not a member.

    Posted by Brenda Larson, 01/05/2010 11:00am (5 years ago)

  • HOW?

    How can the CPUSA ,AFL-CIO,NAACP,La Raza,The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights,and the Center for Community Change unify in action to:

    1. Help joblessness

    2. Rebuild schools,roads, and energy systems

    3. Increase funding to local and state governments

    4. Fund jobs

    5. Put TARP funds to work for local communities ?

    Posted by E.E.W.Clay, 01/04/2010 4:18pm (5 years ago)

  • When will it be published as a pamphlet? Very good program.

    Posted by Emil Shaw, 12/31/2009 1:11pm (5 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments