Capitalism: Big surprises in recent polls

Capitalism

(Majority Agenda) -- According to the conventional wisdom, the United States is a center-right country. But a new poll by Pew casts doubt on that idea. It shows widespread skepticism about capitalism and hints that support for socialist alternatives is emerging as a majoritarian force in America's new generation.  Carried out in late April and published May 4, 2010,  the Pew poll, arguably by the most respected polling company in the country, asked over 1500 randomly selected Americans to describe their reactions to terms such as "capitalism," "socialism," "progressive," "libertarian" and "militia." The most striking findings concern "capitalism" and "socialism." We cannot be sure what people mean by these terms, so the results have to be interpreted cautiously and in the context of more specific attitudes on concrete issues, as discussed later.

Pew summarizes the results in its poll title: "Socialism not so negative; capitalism not so positive." This turns out to be an understatement of the drama in some of the underlying data.  Yes, "capitalism" is still viewed positively by a majority of Americans. But it is just by a bare majority. Only 52% of all Americans react positively. Thirty-seven percent say they have a negative reaction and the rest aren't sure.  A year ago, a Rasmussen poll found similar reactions. Then, only 53% of Americans described capitalism as "superior" to socialism.

Meanwhile, 29% in the Pew poll describe "socialism" as positive. This positive percent soars much higher when you look at key sub-groups, as discussed shortly. A 2010 Gallup poll found 37% of all Americans preferring socialism as "superior" to capitalism.
Keep in mind these findings reflect an overview of the public mind when rightwing views seem at a high point - with the Tea Party often cast as a barometer of American public opinion. The polls in this era do not suggest a socialist country, but not a capitalist-loving one either. This is not a "center-right" America but a populace where almost 50% are deeply ambivalent or clearly opposed to capitalism. Republicans and the Tea Party would likely call that a Communist country.  

The story gets more interesting when you look at two vital sub-groups. One is young people, the "millennial generation" currently between 18 and 30. In the Pew poll, just 43% of Americans under 30 describe "capitalism" as positive. Even more striking, the same percentage, 43%, describes "socialism" as positive. In other words, the new generation is equally divided between capitalism and socialism.  The Pew, Gallup and Rasmussen polls come to the same conclusion. Young people cannot be characterized as a capitalist generation. They are half capitalist and half socialist. Since the socialist leaning keeps rising among the young, it suggests-depending on how you interpret "socialism"-that we are moving toward an America that is either center-left or actually majoritarian socialist.

Turn now to Republicans and Democrats. Sixty-two percent of Republicans in the Pew poll view capitalism as positive, although 81 % view "free markets" as positive, suggesting a sensible distinction in their mind between capitalism and free markets. Even Republicans prefer small to big business and are divided about big business, which many correctly see as a monopolistic force of capitalism undermining free markets.  

The more interesting story, though, is about Democrats. We hear endlessly about Blue Dog Democrats. But the Pew poll shows a surprisingly progressive Democratic base. Democrats are almost equally split in their appraisal of capitalism and socialism. Forty-seven percent see capitalism as positive but 53% do not. And 44% of Democrats define socialism as positive, linking their negativity about capitalism to a positive affirmation of socialism.  Moreover, many other subgroups react negatively to capitalism. Less than 50% of women, low-income groups and less-educated groups describe capitalism as positive. So much for the view that Obama does not have a strong progressive base to mobilize. In fact, "progressive,' according to the Pew poll, is one of the most positive terms in the American political lexicon, with a substantial majority of almost all sub-groups defining it as positive.  

You may conclude that this all add ups to little, since we can't be clear about how people are defining "capitalism" and "socialism." But in my own research, summarized in recent books such as The New Feminized Majority and Morality Wars, attitudes registered in polls toward concrete issues over the last thirty years support the interpretation of the Pew data, at minimum, as evidence of a center-left country.

On nearly every major issue, from support minimum wage and unions, preference for diplomacy over force, deep concern for the environment, belief that big business is corrupting democracy, and support for many major social programs including Social Security and Medicare, the progressive position has been strong and relatively stable. If "socialism" means support for these issues, the interpretation of the Pew poll is a Center-Left country.  If socialism means a search for a genuine systemic alternative, then America, particularly its youth, is emerging as a majoritarian social democracy, or in a majoritarian search for a more cooperativist, green, and more peaceful and socially just order.  Either interpretation is hopeful. It should give progressives assurance that even in the "Age of the Tea Party," despite great dangers and growing concentrated corporate power and wealth, there is a strong base for progressive politics.

We have to mobilize the majority population to recognize its own possibilities and turn up the heat on the Obama administration and a demoralized Democratic Party. If we fail, the right will take up the slack and impose its monopoly capitalist will on a reluctant populace.

Charles Derber, professor of sociology at Boston College and author of Corporation Nation and Greed to Green. He is on the Majority Agenda Project's coordinating committee, info@majorityagendaproject.org.

Photo: Demotivational poster rstrawser/flickr/cc

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • The key word is "principled".
    Obviously capitalism has not operated on a principled basis. Probably largely because of power, greed, misinformation, and prejudice toward "the other".
    All to the harm of the majority of people.

    People problems.

    So what is needed is to make those things clear and to show how socialism has counterforces to those people problems.

    Posted by Gabriel Della-Piana, 07/31/2011 9:35am (3 years ago)

  • Judging by my survey of many locations on the internet web, the question is not capitalism vs an alternative, but merely what that alternative is. Everyone seems to have either forgotten B. F. Skinner's Walden Two or to have discounted it out of hand. But Skinner was correct about human nature, and it should be only a matter of time before enough people come to understand what he was really saying as opposed to what other insist that he was saying. Walden Two is the only via alternative because human nature will not allow any other alternative to prevail for long. The only real question is will humanity survive long enough to bring Skinner's fictional culture to reality?

    Posted by roger mcconnell, 05/26/2011 10:47pm (3 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments