Government wage freeze — a bad idea

JWJ rally520x300

Yesterday President Obama announced his proposal for a two year wage freeze for all non-military government workers.  Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, nailed it when he said, "No one is served by our government participating in a 'race to the bottom' in wages. We need to invest in creating jobs, not undermining the ones we have."

There are a number of reasons the proposal is a terrible idea, but two stand out in my mind. First is the one that Trumka points to: It is bad for the economy.

Even if it's a bargaining ploy for dealing with the Republican obstructionists (or should I say destructionists) it will cause real harm to the economy. The tea party Republican mantra is cut social programs. This proposal feeds right into that idea. Cutting spending on wages and on programs is a prescription for economic disaster. It means less money in circulation, which means less demand, which means more layoffs and unemployment.

This idea feeds right into the notion that cuts and short-term deficit reduction will grow the economy. That sure isn't working too well in Europe. It also highlights the incredible hypocrisy of the far right Republicans who want to cut benefits for millions of the unemployed, while claiming that tax cuts for the super rich will benefit the economy.

This while Big Business America is sitting on several trillion dollars, instead of investing in job creation and building the things the country needs - like green energy and green manufacturing, health care, infrastructure and education. All programs that would put millions back to work and save the economy.

But I think there is another important reason that a federal wage freeze is dangerous. It also feeds into racist, anti-worker stereotypes of the "lazy" public worker.

This was the real meaning of the ultra-right's hullabaloo attack on airport screeners. I don't love the pat down or scanning stuff, as a travel nuisance. But hey, the TSA workers didn't make the policy.

Yes, there are some federal workers who make really big salaries. The far right's stereotype of public workers ignores the reality that the vast majority of federal employees make modest to meager wages. Custodial and hospital workers at the Veterans Administration that make in the $20,000 to $30,000 range are more the norm.

More than that, the overwhelming majority of federal workers provide important services that help people and keep the economy and our country going. Further the savings from a federal wage freeze wouldn't make even a tiny dent in the deficit.

It's not clear to me if members of Congress and Senators are included in the freeze. If they are, we can expect some more self-righteous crying and posturing like we heard from freshman Republicans. They sure were bitter about having to wait a month for their government health care.

Another troubling aspect of the proposed freeze is the question of whether it will violate existing union contracts. It's hard to imagine that it doesn't clash with scheduled pay raises and cost of living provisions. In which case, the proposal sets up a labor struggle between a pro-labor president and the unions. This would be a set back for the coalition that is needed to stop the Republican right-wing destruction machine.

This kind of disunity can hurt the progressive movement and make it easier for the far right to further shift the crisis on to the backs of the working class.

Photo: Pepe Lozano/PW

 

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • It hit the State of Florida workers ages ago. Hard workers are not rewarded and are paid the same as loafers. Why bother working hard? Nothing is done to get rid of loafers. Everyone else sinks to that level of incompetence then.

    Posted by Peony459, 05/11/2014 1:33pm (1 year ago)

  • Once again, President Obama folds up like a cheap tent in the face of Republican hostility.

    Posted by John Whiskey, 12/02/2010 10:56pm (4 years ago)

  • Scotty's"..pro-labor president" statement has been presented consistently in a class struggle context and with qualifications- as this current article does. Thomas Kenny and others seem to have no problem missing this.
    An approach devoid of explanation,struggle,engaging contact with workers and issues is itself "dead wrong",and dead in more ways than one.
    More massive action,like the One Nation Together action
    is what will move the president,and workers(especially government workers). We need to show unity like the workers in Europe are doing now. We need to show opposition with our feet,now.
    No non-engaging conclusions will remedy this,and the difference and space between the president's pro-labor positions and his being"..a servant to finance capital"is the space of real revolutionary struggle and those who only see extremes are themselves,willy nilly,"a servant to finance capital"in the sense that they offer empty nostrums and no struggle,disregarding real life struggles of the movements for change,by the working class.

    Posted by E.E.W. Clay, 12/01/2010 10:10am (4 years ago)

  • I welcome Scott Marshall's denunciation of the Obama wage freeze proposal. The wage freeze has far-reaching implications. For example, it emboldens fellow conservative Democrats such as NY Governor-elect Andrew Cuomo who is eager to attack public sector workers here.

    But Scott concludes with these sentences:

    "...the proposal sets up a labor struggle between a pro-labor president and the unions. This would be a set back for the coalition that is needed to stop the Republican right-wing destruction machine. This kind of disunity can hurt the progressive movement and make it easier for the far right to further shift the crisis on to the backs of the working class."

    What further evidence will it take to realize that the whole analysis of this Administration is dead wrong and that Obama is not a "pro-labor"president. He is attacking labor. He is "shifting the crisis on to the backs of the working class." Nor is the progressive movement in "coalition" with him. He is a servant of finance capital, and he has proven it again and again.

    Posted by Thomas Kenny, New York NY, 11/30/2010 9:06pm (4 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments