Iran: Regime change by the people, for the people!

IranMontazeriFuneralRESIZED

The death of reformist cleric Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri on Dec. 19 has sparked a run of protests in Iran which have both caught the authorities off guard and surprised the opposition by their scale. Official reports suggest that the turnout at Montazeri's funeral on Dec. 21 was up to 500,000 people. Opposition sources claim that the numbers were nearer to one million. Either way, this convergence upon Qom, a city with a population of only 700,000, is significant.

Montazeri had been one of the pillars of the 1979 revolution in Iran but fell out with Ayotollah Khomenei, whom he was designated to succeed, over the Islamic Republic's human rights record and specifically the mass execution of political prisoners in 1988. Montazeri questioned the legality and necessity of the execution of political prisoners. Montazeri was put under house arrest in1997 for criticising the current Supreme Leader, Ayotollah Ali Khamenei. Earlier this year he made clear his opposition to the manipulated outcome of the June 2009 election, which returned Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the presidency by a "landslide" and sparked the current wave of nationwide protests in Iran.

In this context, the death of Montazeri has helped to re-ignite an already volatile situation. On key occasions since the June elections the Iranian people have taken to the streets to demonstrate their opposition to the regime. These have included the ceremony to swear in President Ahmadinejad on Aug. 5; Quds Day on Sept. 18; the Nov. 4 anniversary of the U.S. Embassy occupation; and, most recently, Students Day on Dec. 7.

The protests on Dec. 7 included students waving Iranian flags without the Islamic Republic's emblem and burning posters of Ayotollah Ali Khamenei. Security forces used tear gas and rubber bullets to disperse the protests and attempted to suppress news of the events by sealing off universities, blocking Internet and mobile phone communications. In spite of these measures images of the protests reached Western media and showed widespread violence against protesters.

Even without the death of Montazeri further flashpoints were inevitable. The 27th of December is the festival of Ashura, the most important day in the Shia calendar, and the opposition once again took to the streets. The resulting clashes were the bloodiest yet with the security forces firing live ammunition at protesters. Latest estimates suggest that up to 15 people are reported dead, including Ali Mousavi, the nephew of reformist movement leader Mir Hossein Mousavi. YouTube footage showed police motorcycles burning in the streets, crowds freeing protesters from the Basiji militia and police being stripped of their uniforms and weapons.

The events of Dec. 27 may yet be significant for three further reasons. Firstly, the unprecedented use of force by the security services undermines the claims of the state to be upholding Iran's religious traditions. The festival of Ashura commemorates Imam Hossein, grandson of the Prophet Mohammad and regarded as a martyr in the fight against oppression. Secondly, unlike in previous demonstrations where many protesters covered their faces, images from Dec. 27 show many people with their faces exposed, indicating a growing level of defiance on the part of the opposition. Thirdly, reports suggest that some members of the security forces refused to obey orders when asked to fire on protesters.

If true, this final point is perhaps the most significant, as the identification of the security and armed forces with the cause of the people would signify a major shift in the balance of power. While it may be too early to proclaim such a shift in the power balance in Iran, the fact that protests have not subsided following the June election and that they have increasingly focused upon the authority of Ayotollah Ali Khamenei will give the authorities cause for concern. Such a shift begins to raise questions about the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic itself, not just the government.

How this balance changes will be the critical factor in determining the fate of Iran into 2010 and in particular the fate of the Islamic Republic. The ongoing response of the Iranian people to continued repression should be matched by an equal level of solidarity in the labor, trade union and peace movements across the world to ensure that Iran moves in the direction of genuine democracy. With the hovering threats of both Israel and the United States casting their shadow, it is vital that regime change in Iran is by the people, for the people and not imposed by external forces to meet an external Western agenda. Moving into 2010, this will be the main task of those across the world looking to support the true voices and the actions of the Iranian people.

Jane Green is the national campaign officer of the UK-based CODIR, Committee for the Defence of the Iranian People's Rights.

Photo: The funeral of Ayatollah Montazeri in Tehran, Dec. 21. http://www.flickr.com/photos/hamed/ / CC BY 2.0

 

 

Post your comment

Comments

  • first the vote on afghanistan and now this. Bunch of class-traitors

    Posted by Hafiz ib Ya'qub, 01/08/2010 11:31pm (8 months ago)

  • "I could go on at lenght on this but I actually want people to read these comments just to see what a handful of ultra leftists who live on an alternate reality will end up defending."

    Of course we are ultra-leftists compared to the extremely rightist psuedo-communist CPUSA, its a sad day when you see supposed communists time and time again take the side of imperialism and american patriotism over socialism. why not merge into the Democratic Party already? hell ive even seen Dennis Kucinich take further left positions than the CPUSA leadership and writers at PW these days.

    Posted by Comrade Acero, 01/08/2010 11:29pm (8 months ago)

  • "I will not waste my time with ANYONE PERIOD who has the fairly disgusting sense to say something like this "I could care less whether Ahmadinejad was an anti-semite" that is absolutely unacceptable and borderline criminal in my eyes."

    What a cop-out, and way to twist what I was saying. Yeah I dont care if he is an anti-semite because it factors ZERO into his politics, the Iranian state is the only state sponsor of Palestinian and Iraqi resistance against Imperialism PERIOD. Whereas good ole Israel-friendly clowns like the CPUSA have the nerve to criticize the Palestinian people for "terrorism" against Israel but say not a damn thing about israel. Calling Ahmadinijad or ANY middle east politician out on anti-semitism is really disgusting, its like calling Elijah Muhammad a racist without knowing the context of his beliefs, having views like that is understandable, and you will find a lot of liberation groups in that area have them, and its not like the Zionist state does not either. I am opposed to both beliefs but then again I don't blame the victims of racism and imperialism for their beliefs, they formed them from being at the recieving end, and its necessary to criticize them by first understanding their feelings are from brutal oppression. But ill leave the imperialist ass-kissing to you my "friend". Also Communists have no morality when it comes to politics, the Soviets had an extremely unambigous stance on anti-imperialism even if the anti-imperialists were reactionaries. Progressive is always subjective, the bourgeoisie in the context of fuedalism were revolutionary, and figures like Khomeini dealt with fuedalism and figures like the Shah.

    "Also your lightweight accusation against Tudeh is typical of an internet warrior and someone who so very little understands that originally the idea was to get rid of a US puppet like the Shah. That required in the view of my comrades cooperation with everyone who was against that other lunatic. THAT you can make a case for a critique, but that in no way could justify the brutal reaction by the regime. The only thing your 5 friends may be onto is that progressives and communists should have never trusted the fundamentalists, which incidentally is EXACTLY what I am doing."

    Sorry, the criticism of Tudeh was legit, it was always a supporter of the Iranian regime, it tailed the Soviet line, instead of forming an independent one based on their own national conditions.

    Posted by Comrade Acero, 01/08/2010 11:24pm (8 months ago)

  • "Comrade Acero" I will not waste my time with ANYONE PERIOD who has the fairly disgusting sense to say something like this "I could care less whether Ahmadinejad was an anti-semite" that is absolutely unacceptable and borderline criminal in my eyes. Further the question I asked was if you were justifying the murder of thousands of communists by these thugs, not a cheap polemic on their perceived lack of "ideological purity" Regardless your method of doing politics which is akin to a 5 year old saying "well he did this to me too" showcases a lack of morality that I simply have no words for. I will stick to my idea of progressive my backwards friend and I will say that Khomeini PAINTED himself as a progressive option to gather around him the truly progressive forces he then murderously betrayed. He is as revolutionary as you are really.

    Also your lightweight accusation against Tudeh is typical of an internet warrior and someone who so very little understands that originally the idea was to get rid of a US puppet like the Shah. That required in the view of my comrades cooperation with everyone who was against that other lunatic. THAT you can make a case for a critique, but that in no way could justify the brutal reaction by the regime. The only thing your 5 friends may be onto is that progressives and communists should have never trusted the fundamentalists, which incidentally is EXACTLY what I am doing.

    "bob" have got to love the "nuanced" response no? your approach reeks of out of touch voluntarism, the masses and in particular the genuine revolutionaries in Iran ON THE GROUND have made very clear that the overthrowing of the regime in Iran would be but ONE step towards genuine people's power, to not understand that is really not understanding very much. Further I imagine you find this funny? "he just gets carried away from time to time" wow that left me a tad speechless. I could go on at lenght on this but I actually want people to read these comments just to see what a handful of ultra leftists who live on an alternate reality will end up defending.

    Posted by Mikhail, 01/06/2010 7:51am (8 months ago)

  • Lol, Anti Semite? He has made some rather disturbing comments aye, but first and foremost he is anti Zionist... he just gets carried away from time to time.

    Look, I agree the regime in the IRI needs to go, but it needs to be replaced with an anti imperialist one, and the reformists will not do so. So no, I do not support these protests, as if successful they will not strengthen the Iranian peoples defenses against US - Israeli imperialism.

    Show me a mass movement that will do something good for Iran... that isn't headed by rich students and petty bourgeois, and that's not going to throw in the towel against the imperialists, and I will be first in line to support it.

    Posted by Comrade Rob, 01/04/2010 8:01pm (8 months ago)

  • "let us presume there was one miserable ounce of truth to this (there isn't) is this a really pathetic excuse to qualify them as fair game for the fundamentalists?? and are you insinuating that a retrograde manipulator like Khomeni, who used communists and revolutionaries to carry out the revolution, is actually a more progressive option than Tudeh??????? Why would I not be surprised if you said yes??"

    I have accurately described the Tudeh Party, from my Toufan contacts in Germany. The Tudeh Party(along with the Fedaian majority) far from being an opponent of the regime in Iran actually supported it initially while other left groups like Toufan opposed the Iranian regime from the beginning like Toufan. Its funny you have a bad case of Amnesia on this history. Now for Khomeni, he indeed WAS a progressive figure, he despite being a fanatic managed to play an anti-fuedal role in Iranian politics, his role against the Shah was indeed progressive and he managed to transform the iranian economy from a semi-fuedal basis to building capitalism. Progressive is a subjective term, the Emir of Afghanistan a century ago was a progressive figure(despite being a Monarch) because he opposed British Imperialism while the Social-Democrats in Europe were reactionary because they supported it.

    "Further your ridiculous idea that Iran is somehow "anti imperialist" is destroyed by the weight of the evidence. You confuse anti imperialism with the more accurate fight between imperialists and the regime's own attempts to set up spheres of influence."

    Iran's own "spheres of influence" are preferable to some hegemonic monolithic power in the world. Iranian regional influence was really preferrable to Soviet or American imperialism dominating the region extracting resources from these peoples since these two powers were much harder to combat, and you can see this in the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Czechoslovakia and its use of mercenary forces from Cuba and the Eastern Bloc. Regional dominance is much easier to deal with since its actually weaker. Iran DOES play an anti-imperialist role it funds the Iraqi resitance against American occupation, and is the only government to do so.

    "The Iranian regime has cooperated extensively with US imperialism and its allies (not to mention the fact that the loong lists of communists executed by the Islamists came from CIA lists)not to mention how very diligently they helped the US in their Afghan attack."

    The Tudeh Party has collaborated with the Iranian regime as well, instead of opposing it in the first place. If Tudeh was not accused of being spies then they would still be supporting this regime as a phony communist party, just like the Iraqi Communist Party which supports the puppet regime as well as the CPUSA which supports imperialism through its support of the supposedly "progressive" democrats as well as refusing to condemn the escalation in Afghanistan.

    "god if I were to believe you, an anti semite like Ahmadinejad is one step from singing the "Internationale"! What crap and how sad at the same time!"

    I could care less whether Ahmadinejad was an anti-semite, his politics are the same of the Palestinian Hamas and Lebanese Hezbollah, which also combat Imperialism, these politics don't matter on whether Iran is free or not, he is thoroughly for the self-determination of Iran against joint American-Israeli Imperialism. i'd support the Devil if he was fighting a greater evil, which is American Imperialism.

    Posted by Comrade Acero, 01/04/2010 7:02pm (8 months ago)

  • What I love about your definition is that is indeed of the clueless kind. You have obviously not lived a DAY in Iran yet are able to fill your little pamphlet with technicalities that certainly made the Persian writer for my magazine exclaim "this guy doesn't have a "bleeping clue" what he is talking about" not that I was surprised she would say that. Further religion IS fair game for criticism unless you are actually insinuating it is not. The dogma of religion is simply put dangerous, if I have to explain this further to you, well you need help. I never said by the way my manipulative friend that I would want to line up religious types and shoot them or something ridiculous like that, as your Islamists buddies would do if I claimed to be a communist in Iran or if I claimed that religion is little more than organized mythology by the way (a detail ohh you soooo quickly forget)

    Also if you haven't noticed I spoke of backwards, reactionary right wing fundamentalist Islamists, not all Muslims could possibly fit this criteria so if you feel the need to get knee jerky well dude that is your own guilt popping up. If you haven't picked up on this most people protesting against the regime are Muslims (not that your PC police bothers to notice that)

    As per Mousavi and the smart ass remark by "Comrade Acero"(wtf?) he is only confirming my point that the Islamic regime is NOT what Iran needs, while I am not surprised by his particular lack of concern for communists executed by these monsters who liked among other things to get people to admit to the wrongness of their "materialist" ideology under torture and to praise Allah before being executed. Again religion in general and not just Islam is a step back in human evolution, which from an intellectual perspective offends my critical thinking, having said that people should be able to worship goats for all I care as long as they don't get in the way of a revolutionary state.

    Now care to clarify this? "Now for the Tudeh Party, I'm not sure how it is NOW, but prior to the Revolution, the Tudeh Party was a reformist Party in cahoots with the Social-Imperialist and Revisionist Soviet Union and I doubt it has gotten any better" let us presume there was one miserable ounce of truth to this (there isn't) is this a really pathetic excuse to qualify them as fair game for the fundamentalists?? and are you insinuating that a retrograde manipulator like Khomeni, who used communists and revolutionaries to carry out the revolution, is actually a more progressive option than Tudeh??????? Why would I not be surprised if you said yes??

    Ohh and I do want a socialist Iran my lost friend, and genuine progressives in Iran are steadfastly (truly so) against imperialism, for you to pretend otherwise simply shows how very little you actually know of the situation on the ground.

    Further your ridiculous idea that Iran is somehow "anti imperialist" is destroyed by the weight of the evidence. You confuse anti imperialism with the more accurate fight between imperialists and the regime's own attempts to set up spheres of influence. The Iranian regime has cooperated extensively with US imperialism and its allies (not to mention the fact that the loong lists of communists executed by the Islamists came from CIA lists)not to mention how very diligently they helped the US in their Afghan attack. Also don't even get me started with their economic and social policies that have NOTHING AT ALL to do with genuine anti imperialist struggles. Almost all trade unionists are rotting in jail or underground, communist parties and left parties are BANNED (get it? BANNED) just to name a few jewels, god if I were to believe you, an anti semite like Ahmadinejad is one step from singing the "Internationale"! What crap and how sad at the same time!

    Posted by Mikhail, 01/04/2010 5:03pm (8 months ago)

  • Also, Mikhail:

    First Off, 'religion is the opiate of the masses' is a MATERIALIST explanation for religion. It was pointing out that people turn to religion due to the oppressive conditions around them.

    This is true in Iran, as it is all over the world. Marx's quote that people are so fond of, was in no way a call to go around showing your 'Atheist pride', bashing every religious movement in sight and substituting that for a genuine materialist analysis of said movements. It was an effort to try to help us UNDERSTAND religion, not merely make it 'fair game for criticism'.

    Lenin pointed out that since Religion is tied inseparably to material conditions, ones religion needs to be put on the back burner, until we can understand the conditions that gave rise to their convictions, and what they really represent, rhetoric aside. Lenin, while he welcomed pushing forward 'Materialist Propaganda', encouraged us to remember that there are more important things to consider then religion.

    Point being, if your analysis of the Islamists is always going to be negative simply because of their religious views, it is you who is in an 'ideological mess'.

    That all said and done, workers will have the same sort of 'say' they have in Egypt, or Turkey or any other bourgeois state. The communist slayer, and former prime minister Mousavi, and his 'green movement' that seeks to 'restore relations' with The US, Israel and the 'western world', is not going to do much for workers in the long term.

    I'll tell you what... if these demonstrations are successful, and the IRI is toppled and Mousavi is in power, I'm going to post here in a few months or whatever, and you can reply and praise the green movement and all the accomplishments they have done. Does that sound good?

    Of course not.. as soon as it becomes clear what Mousavi represents you guys are going to be back here calling for more change in Iran.. railing against the unjust and imperialist puppet regime in Iran.

    Posted by Comrade Rob, 01/03/2010 6:55pm (8 months ago)

  • Too bad the Tudeh Party was suppressed, executed, and tortured under the Mousavi administration.

    Posted by Comrade Rob, 01/03/2010 6:28pm (8 months ago)

  • Not really surprising since this is the same CPUSA which voted this down:

    http://mltoday.com/en/another-dark-day-in-cpusa-history-739.html

    Posted by Comrade Acero, 01/03/2010 6:25pm (8 months ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments