Jobs for America Now can be catalyst for mass action

MassJobsnotGreedJCRESIZED

Build the fight for jobs - Part 1

First in a series of three articles

Rick Nagin also co-authored this series.

In the name of a wide coalition of people's organizations, Richard Trumka, the new president of the AFL-CIO, has called for a massive campaign to fight for jobs. This effort, to be kicked off in January, is badly needed and long overdue. It brings the power, resources and fighting experience of the labor movement, both the AFL-CIO and Change To Win, together with the NAACP, National Council of La Raza, the United States Student Association, Jobs with Justice and other major civil rights, religious, environmental, women's, youth and other people's groups, to bear on this critical issue and can be the catalyst to mobilize millions of suffering and angry people into needed action. This should be the center of activity in the coming period for the entire labor and people's movement.

Fight for jobs and relief

The new coalition, called Jobs for America Now, has issued a five-point program, aimed at shifting the nation's priorities toward creating millions of jobs, relieving suffering and revitalizing our economy. It calls for the federal government to:

* Extend expiring unemployment, social service and continuation of health benefits for another year.

* Rebuild the nation's infrastructure and schools. Invest in mass transportation, green technology and energy efficiency.

* Provide aid to state and local governments and school districts to maintain vital services and jobs.

* Directly fund federal employment with competitive wages targeting distressed communities when the private sector fails to provide necessary jobs.

* Use TARP funds for Main Street to create jobs with loans to local banks and businesses.

This is a solid progressive program that would turn our nation around if enacted. However, programs mean little unless translated into mass movements to win their enactment. It is urgent for union activists and their progressive allies to begin organizing grassroots committees in every community to support the goals of this broad, labor-led coalition.

With organized labor in the lead, efforts are needed to involve local public officials, leaders in the faith and academic communities, community organizations and local businesses. This is especially the case in communities of the racially oppressed where the unemployment and despair are the greatest. The Congressional Black Caucus has already served notice it will make jobs the top priority in 2010.

Environmentalists can play an important role, identifying green energy projects that can be carried out with union labor. Peace forces can also help in showing how much more productive it is to fund jobs instead of war.

It is critical that the unemployed themselves are integrally involved at all levels. That will assure that this becomes a self-sustaining movement, where the direct victims of the crisis can express their experiences and concerns, voice their anger and help organize the fight. Social service agencies should be brought into the campaign to help involve the unemployed.

The campaign needs to be flexible and comprehensive in its tactics, including town hall meetings, lobbying, phone campaigns, petitions and, especially, mass public protests to develop a new level of militancy and reflect the anger people feel toward the corporate criminals that created this depression. Local coalitions can not only promote the five-point program but also monitor the scope and integrity of whatever stimulus programs are currently under way.

It is difficult to overstate the importance of such a movement at this time. After over a year of obstruction by congressional Republicans and conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats, with corporate-funded right-wing thugs attacking health care meetings, and with insufficient mobilization by labor and its allies, the progressive agenda that swept the Obama administration to power is largely unfulfilled. There is growing anger, cynicism and frustration. There is justifiable concern that the stalemate could lead to a setback in the 2010 midterm elections.

In fact, building a mass movement for jobs could be decisive in preventing this from happening. Generating street heat on this issue will dramatically expose the dangers of a Republican resurgence and mobilize positive election results. It will encourage Democratic candidates to voice the desperation of their constituents. The Jobs for America Now campaign can be the catalyst to turn our political fortunes around and get the progressive agenda back on track.

Part 2 of this series: Confronting corporate ideology in the fight for jobs
Part 3: Challenging anti-government ideas

Photo: PW/Jose Cruz

 

Post your comment

Comments

  • •I see my posts and questions are being deleted. Great way to answer questions. Bye.

    Posted by Barb, 01/25/2010 5:25pm (2 months ago)

  • Barb, we may see the CPUSA name on the banner, but, as a leader of the party and a union activist my personal feeling would be that it isn't needed and would be a magnet for the ultra-right to attack the wider coalition if it were on the masthead. That is NOT to say that the party and left isn't wanted, just the opposite is true. We are welcomed. However, I see it as a matter of political maturity rather than ego. We can, and need to, be part of the wide coalition and can bring much to the table, but we want to do what we can to protect the new coalition from unnessecary attack. Those issues can shift as our party grows and as we put forward what a real socialist alternative for people to see.

    Posted by bruce bostick, 01/24/2010 3:07pm (2 months ago)

  • barb_

    soon you and all of your stalinist friends will be done on this site.

    Posted by Kamran Heiss, Junior, 01/22/2010 8:51pm (2 months ago)

  • Bruce why won't we see the name of the Communist Party on the masthead if the Communist Party is part of the coalition?

    Posted by Barb, 01/19/2010 10:57pm (2 months ago)

  • barb---just to attempt to address some of your questions.

    First, on ideology. If you check out #2 of this three part piece, it deals with corporate vs. working class ideology. In basic, corporate ideology, or capitalist ideology, is the ideology of the ruling class of our nation. It is a set of ideas based on furthering the interests of ruling capitalist class. As such, it is based on individualism, that we are defined as individuals isolated from the mass of people, at all times competing with each other for what meager crumbs fall from the master's table. It is steeped in racism, male supremacy, homophobia and always, at all times, in all its forms, is anti-working class. Capitalist ideology is based in all types of divisiveness because a divided working class has no power to confront its corporate rulers successfully. Capitalist ideology is based on profits for the few, greed and exploitation. That is due to the fact that capitalists can only make profits by exploiting the labor of workers. Capitalist ideology is also an ideology of war, dividing nation against nation in order to better be able to exploit the resources of other nations for the profit of multi-national corporations.

    Working class ideology, what many of us call Marxism, is based on unity of all peoples for the common good. Only when the workers are united do they have the power to be able to confront corporate power, and be able to wrench concessions from that class. Working class ideology is for peace, for developing a common national and international perspective to find ways forward that help meet the needs of all people, with the common labor of all going to produce betterment of all people, instead of the profits of a few. this is the ideology of the CPUSA and of similiar, like-minded parties of working folks throughout the world. There continue to be debates over how working class ideology should be applied and there are many different approaches, with communist, socialist and labour parties all claiming adherence to these ideas. This is an ongoing debate, but, we communists, do not see these as the same type off differences as those with the corporate enemies, and are working to find ways to unite all working class movements. Communists see Marxism as an ideology that is constantly being tested and applied on the ground, not a set of dogmatic "rules."

    The Democratic party in our nation, like the Republican, is a party formed and based on capitalist ideas. It is one of two parties which legally and institutionally dominate politics in our nation. However, the wide tents that make up the two parties are actually huge coalitions that can shift positions over time. The Democratic party, while certainly a corporate based party, is also the party/coalition that the vast majority of working people, minorities, women and progressives have worked within, while the Republican party has become a coalition of the main corporte forces, the most war-like elements, racist, anti-women and homophobic forces.

    Generally, we see the Democratic party, while a very diverse grouping that also include conservative forces, the party that gives working class and progressive forces the best opportunity to win concessions from the capitalist class, that is, if a big labor-led peoples movement is developed and militantly fighting for its demands.

    At the present time, the new Jobs For America Now coalition is just developing, and it isn't really on the ground running yet. It will probably develop differently from area to area, but will generally be based in the labor movement and African American communities, in the first place. Probably the best way to stay in touch with the developments would be, if you're not now in touch with them, to get in touch with the closest club of the CPUSA. While our name will not appear on the masthead of the Jobs coalition, we are absolutely in the middle of these developments and our help is very much welcomed.

    please feel free to contact me if you have trouble reaching an existing CPUSA club-- brucebostick@wowway.com

    that's the thumbnail!

    Posted by bruce bostick, 01/19/2010 12:47pm (2 months ago)

  • Barb I like your suggestions. You sure have lots f questions. First we need to change the name of the cpusa. We can't work under this name in the mass movements or coalitions. It would be good if Rick Nagin would provide the name change that will take place at the convention then we could get to work on these things.

    I want to suggest you read an excellent book that will answer a lot of your questions- "Can Capitalism Last? by our own Danny Rubin. He has a lot of experience in such matters.

    Carl Davidson has a lot of the answers to your questions too. I am so glad to see Sam Webb and Carl Davidson sharing the same thinking on so many things. Maybe we can get the CoC and cpusa members to come together when we rename the cpusa.

    Posted by weneedanewname, 01/16/2010 12:33pm (2 months ago)

  • Three more question:

    What would be---

    1. A victory in the 2010 Elections?

    2. What would be a "setback" in the 2010 midterm Elections?

    3. What are "midterm" elections?

    Posted by Barb, 01/16/2010 9:41am (2 months ago)

  • I forgot to ask:

    How does one go about joining "Jobs for America Now?"

    Please provide contact information.

    Can individuals join or is this only for organizations?

    Is there a fee to join?

    Is the CPUSA a member of "Jobs for America Now?"

    Please provide a complete list of all the organizations that are members so we know if an organization we belong to is already a member.

    Posted by Barb, 01/16/2010 9:37am (2 months ago)

  • Question: What is the ideology of the corporations?

    Question: What is the ideology of the Democratic Party?

    Question: What is Barack Obama's ideology?

    Question: What is the ideology of the working class?

    Question: What is the ideology of the CPUSA?

    Posted by Barb, 01/16/2010 9:30am (2 months ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments