Union leaders critical of Obama’s budget blueprint

afge520x315

WASHINGTON - Union leaders are criticizing President Obama's $3.78 trillion federal budget and spending blueprint for the fiscal year starting Oct. 1.

Their biggest criticism is of his proposal, offered as a so-called "olive branch" to congressional Republicans, to reduce future Social Security cost-of-living increases by tying them to the so-called "chained CPI." That's a measure of inflation that is smaller than the normal Consumer Price Index currently used to calculate the yearly hikes.

"Cutting Social Security benefits and shifting costs to Medicare beneficiaries -- while exempting corporate America from shared sacrifice -- is wrong and indefensible," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said.

The chained CPI scheme also drew negative reviews from congressional Democrats and defenders of Social Security. Meanwhile, the GOP demanded even more cuts in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, while rejecting Obama's proposals to close tax loopholes that the rich and corporations use.

Obama's budget, formally unveiled April 10, is more useful as an outline of administration priorities than it is as a spending plan, as both the Democratic-run Senate and the GOP-run House already approved their own separate budget blueprints - which are also purely political documents.

That didn't stop Trumka, Steelworkers retirees leader Jim Centner, AFGE President J. David Cox and Letter Carriers President Fredric Rolando from lacing into Obama's spending blueprint. All four criticized the chained CPI. Cox also blasted Obama's proposed $35 billion in cuts aimed at federal workers' pensions as "unnecessary and cruel." Rolando said Obama still wants to cut Saturday postal service.

Trumka said the Social Security cuts would cost current and future retirees $130 billion over the next decade "and much more in future years." He also criticized the $64 billion in cost-shifting to Medicare beneficiaries. "Putting aside the injustice of demanding sacrifice from the innocent while letting the guilty off scot free, the Obama budget falls short of putting our economy on a path towards higher wages and full employment," Trumka said.

"As we have said many times, the greatest economic challenge facing America is the jobs crisis, not the deficit. Yet the administration cuts the part of the budget that pays for investments in worker training and jobs, already cut to its lowest level since the Eisenhower administration, by another $100 billion. This is bad economic policy when the economy remains weak and we urgently need more job-creating investments."

Trumka reserved his praise for a few Obama proposals, including taxing overseas profits of U.S. corporations. He also praised Obama's proposal for universal access to pre-kindergarten, which the Teachers have pushed for years. Obama would fund that by doubling the federal tobacco tax. Trumka also praised Obama's proposals to strengthen Labor Department programs against "wage theft, unsafe workplaces and employer retaliation."

"The poets remind us that it is easier to forgive an enemy than a friend.  But it is hard to forgive our friend President Obama when his administration continues to act more and more like our enemies," Cox said.

Obama's moves include a three-year pay freeze, a shift of retirement system costs for new workers that will cut their pay "by 2.3 percent forever," and his agreement to the sequester, Cox said. That's cut federal workers' pay through "lengthy furloughs on federal workers while leaving the larger, costlier contractor workforce untouched."

"And now, in a final act of betrayal, the White House proposes $35 billion MORE (his emphasis) in retirement system cuts, accelerating the race to the bottom for federal workers and their families," Cox said. "We cannot understand how an administration that claims to stand up for working and middle-class Americans can simultaneously push policies that have imposed and would impose even more enormous pain on its own workforce." Trumka agreed with Cox's criticism of the budget's proposals targeting federal workers.

Rolando said that "slashing Letter Carrier jobs and weakening the Postal Service by eliminating Saturday delivery while reducing the quality of service for our customers, instead of ending the retiree health pre-funding mandate altogether, is plain wrong -especially at a time of high unemployment."

Centner called Obama's budget "disappointing" because of the cost-of-living cuts through the chained CPI. That and the Medicare cuts "place the burden of our nation's debt unfairly on the back of seniors," he said. "Social Security has not contributed a single penny to the federal deficit.  The program is funded by workers' and employers' contributions and should be excluded from any budget discussion," Centner declared.

Obama touted a $1.8 billion for worker job safety, wage and hour and other enforcement programs. His proposal - in spending authority, not actual money - also includes a proposed $8 million cut in Mine Safety and Health Administration state grants. Overall, MSHA would get $381 million, with more targeted to enforcement. OSHA would get $571 million from Obama's budget. 

Photo: The American Federation of Government Employees says the Obama budget blueprint would slash the value of workers' pensions.   AFGE/Flickr

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • The real problem with this betrayal is that it OPENS THE DOOR. Much like the corporate push for concessions in the '80's, once it was opened just a crack, the floodgates were thrown open & union workers lost wages, benefits and shop-floor rights quicker than you could write them down.

    If this is adopted, it becomes a time bomb that explode massively every election cycle; "See, the Democrats want to cut Social Security!" (&, unfortunately, they'll be right)! This is an opening gun for what will, if adopted, become a feeding orgy, led by the GOP, but joined now by the Dems. We'll be able to look back on this as "Obama's air traffic controller moment!"

    This is being sold, falsely, as a 'little adjustment,' but, in truth, it is a huge blow to working people. If not defeated, it will become a death blow, not only to Social Security as we know it, but retiree security as a whole & to the Democratic Party!

    Posted by bruce bostick, 04/12/2013 9:41am (1 year ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments