AFL-CIO leader: No coincidence unions and voting rights under attack simultaneously
Liz Shuler, the AFL-CIO’s Secretary Treasurer. | aflcio.org

WASHINGTON (PAI)—Labor’s strong campaign to preserve and strengthen voting rights, joined by those of civil rights, religious, and civic allies, took center stage at a key session of the AFL-CIO’s Northeast Regional meeting for union leaders and activists.

But speakers, including federation Secretary-Treasurer Liz Shuler, the keynoter, didn’t neglect other causes, especially the Protect the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. She linked them.

“It’s also a civil rights bill,” Shuler declared of the PROAct, labor’s top legislative priority. “And it’s no coincidence there’s an attack on unions at the same time there’s an attack on voting rights.” The corporate elite and radical right “want to divide us and want to disenfranchise us.”

Left unsaid, though: The PROAct, along with other progressive and pro-worker legislation, including climate change bills, the American Jobs Plan, strengthening OSHA, aid to students and schools, and more, would die on the vine without filibuster reform.

And it would be shelved forever if the right wing and white nationalists gain permanent hegemony over the U.S., though they’re in the minority—a hegemony that can be prevented if Congress passed the For the People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, the legislation discussed at the June 10 session. The For the People Act, in particular, would halt the danger.

The burgeoning slew of GOP threats to voting rights, state by state—almost 400 pieces of legislation and counting—“are a threat to the entire labor agenda,” said Clayola Brown, longtime union officer, former president of the A. Philip Randolph Institute and head of the federation’s Civil, Human and Women’s Rights Department.

“Everything that has to do with us has to do with voting rights,” she told the regional session, one of six the federation has hosted for unionists in different sectors of the U.S.

“Workers are always the first to be attacked, especially” if they are workers of color, Brown elaborated. At the same time, she noted, some unionists tune out the right to vote issue, thinking it important only to those workers. It’s important to all, she stated.

One slide posted on the Zoom split screen during the presentation said it all: “The people in power want to control and limit the right to vote in order to stay in power.”

That even included the union movement, Brown noted, as the AFL, before the merger, did not order all-white unions to integrate; that stance fell after the merger with the CIO in 1955.

But nationally, Brown added, “it’s incredible how much has changed over the years—and how much has stayed the same.”

Poll taxes have been replaced, in the new round of repression, with fees for documents workers need to prove their right to register. The usual mode is to charge high fees for drivers’ licenses, passports, birth certificates, or other ID voters need. But that’s not all.

In Texas, for example, certain IDs are legal to help you register, and others aren’t. College ID cards, carried by presumably pro-Democratic students, are unusable. Gun permits, presumably carried by right-wing Republican whites, are legal IDs for voter registration.

And Florida’s gerrymandered GOP-run legislature was particularly toxic, said Alex Roe, managing counsel of the AFL-CIO’s Union Lawyers Alliance. There, two-thirds of voters decided via a 2020 referendum to restore voting rights to 1.4 million former felons, disproportionately people of color, who have served their terms.

Then the white GOP majority passed and white right-wing GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis signed legislation mandating the ex-felons, most of whom are poor, must pay all their high fines, fees, and court costs before they can register to vote. That law effectively re-disenfranchises them.

Challenges from outside private  “poll watchers” replace literacy tests. Polling stations have been closed by the hundreds, all in majority-Black areas. And in 2013, the Supreme Court eliminated preclearance, where the Justice Department had to sign off on voting rights changes in areas with a history of voter discrimination.

Republican-run states rushed to implement a slew of voting restrictions. “In the past 20 years, we’re going back in time,” Brown commented.

To combat the repression, Brown and Roe outlined a four-pronged drive to protect and enhance voting rights.

The prongs start with geographic outreach to union members, both to convince them of the absolute priority they must give to preserving, protecting, and enhancing voting rights.

Then there’s advocacy, to convince unionists to lobby lawmakers—especially Senate Republicans—for the For The People and John Lewis Acts.

The other two prongs are relationship building with like-minded civil rights, civic and religious groups, for joint campaigns, and building capacity to train workers and their allies as poll watchers, monitors, and reporters of election repression, county by county.

But there was one more problem which the session ran out of time before it could tackle it: Pervasive voter cynicism. Participant Alana Lewis brought it up in the Q&A, and there’s no answer, yet: “There has to be voter education against all the false information out there. A lot of people believe they vote and don’t get anything out of it,” she said.

 


CONTRIBUTOR

Mark Gruenberg
Mark Gruenberg

Mark Gruenberg is head of the Washington, D.C., bureau of People's World. He is also the editor of Press Associates Inc. (PAI), a union news service in Washington, D.C. that he has headed since 1999. Previously, he worked as Washington correspondent for the Ottaway News Service, as Port Jervis bureau chief for the Middletown, NY Times Herald Record, and as a researcher and writer for Congressional Quarterly. Mark obtained his BA in public policy from the University of Chicago and worked as the University of Chicago correspondent for the Chicago Daily News.

Comments

comments