Canada: Trudeau plans 70 percent military spending increase
From right, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stands with Minister of National Defense Harjit Singh Sajjan and Chief of Defense Staff Jonathan Vance as he holds a press conference at NATO headquarters during the NATO Summit in Brussels, Belgium on Thursday, May 25. | Sean Kilpatrick / The Canadian Press via AP

Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Christa Freeland, Defense Minister Harjit Sajjan, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau are working hard to convince Canadians that a 70 percent increase in military spending is a noble expression of their government’s commitment to Arctic sovereignty and global security. But the truth is much simpler and a lot uglier: the Liberals are preparing to take Canada to war.

In a reversal of the Liberal promises during the 2015 federal election, the government has adopted Harper’s aggressive foreign policy of war and regime change, and surpassed the vast military expenditures the Tories planned to make – but had to back off from as a result of vocal public opposition.

What’s new? The arrival of Donald Trump, his demand that Canada and other NATO member states increase military spending to 2 percent of GDP, and Trudeau’s immediate acquiescence in February while meeting with Angela Merkel in Germany. Merkel also promised to deliver, while both leaders offered cash and soldiers with boots on the ground, to be deployed wherever NATO (read: the U.S.) was inclined to organize the next regime change (read: coup d’état).

The background to these developments is last year’s announcement that NATO no longer sees itself as a North Atlantic Treaty Organization, but as the world’s policeman with the ability to overthrow governments at will, anywhere in the world.

Trump, who just last year also campaigned as a ‘peace’ candidate who could get along with Russia and find political solutions in global hotspots like the Middle East, said then that NATO was obsolete.

Pierre Trudeau [former prime minister and father of the current one], when he was faced with U.S. ultimatums over Vietnam and Cuba, among others, developed a two-track foreign policy which kept Canada out of the Vietnam War and in a friendly relationship with Cuba including trade, tourism, and cultural exchanges. It was far different from the U.S. policy of economic blockade, invasion, chemical and biological warfare, and hundreds of assassination attempts on Fidel Castro.

Justin Trudeau, on the other hand, has put up no resistance to U.S. demands on foreign policy and military spending, or on trade. In every case, the Liberals have responded with concessions, not only on trade and foreign policy, but on issues affecting the fundamentals of Canadian sovereignty and independence.

To be sure, the Canadian economy has been shot through with U.S. corporate investment and ownership, and the resulting pervasive influence of U.S. multinational corporations. But the Liberals’ capitulation to U.S. demands to increase military spending by 70 percent and gear up to become a full partner in the U.S. war machine, is breathtaking.

It’s also criminal. Overthrowing governments you don’t like is a crime under international law, and under Canadian law too. Terrorist attacks in Canada will increase as Canada is increasingly identified as a terrorist state that is a full partner in illegal U.S. and NATO wars of aggression.

The government has said nothing about how it will pay for this 70 percent increase in military spending. But since it has ruled out corporate tax increases to pay for social programs and infrastructure spending, the only other options are (1) to increase taxes on working people such as the regressive Harmonized Sales Tax, property taxes, gas tax, taxes on alcohol and other ‘sin’ taxes, invisible taxes and user fees, such as road tolls, child care fees, etc., and/or (2) to eliminate universal social programs such as Medicare, privatize public services and assets, privatize education, eliminate the supply management system in agriculture, increase the pension age to 67 or 70, introduce right-to-work laws and smash the trade union movement, and drive down wages and living standards.

Sound extreme? Just look south of the border, where a similar agenda is leaving millions of working people unemployed and on the margins, living from hand to mouth, with nothing left but a deep hatred for Wall Street, and (for some), an abiding faith in the billionaire president who said he would fight to restore their jobs and living standards – by making America great again.

Trump’s prescription for recovery is war: huge profits for the arms industry that backed him, and jobs for life (a short life) for the young unemployed.

It’s not an agenda the Liberals want to admit to two years before an election, but it’s an agenda that’s already out there in the NAFTA ‘renegotiations’ and in the NATO deployments and vast increase in military spending.

Chrystia Freeland’s assertion that this is an expression of Canadian sovereignty and independence is nothing of the sort. It’s a craven collapse to the demands of the Trump administration and U.S. imperialism. Why Freeland? Her grandfather’s Nazi past may make it easier for her to churn out this fictional version of the Canada-U.S. relationship and global politics, while Trudeau may find it more difficult to junk his father’s history as a friend of Cuba and a head of government willing to say no to Uncle Sam. His plan to attend the funeral of Fidel Castro – so quickly reversed after public attacks in the media – suggests this PM is not up for a fight, preferring appeasement to a vital political struggle for Canada’s sovereignty and independence from U.S. control.

What’s the solution here?

Pretty simple in fact. This is exactly the moment for Canada to withdraw from NATO (and NORAD) and from NAFTA. Instead, the Canadian government should pursue a foreign policy of peace and disarmament and a trade policy that is multi-national and mutually beneficial.

Instead of increasing military spending, we should cut the existing military budget by 75 percent and use these funds to create good jobs across Canada; build affordable housing and infrastructure; develop a sustainable industrial strategy and expand value-added manufacturing and secondary industry; expand and improve Medicare; introduce a universal, accessible, affordable public childcare system; fund public and post-secondary education and eliminate tuition fees and student debt; increase the minimum wage and pensions; raise wages and living standards; deliver on promises made to Indigenous People for urgent and long-term funding to raise living standards on and off reserve, for just and urgent settlement of land claims, to implement the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and to create nation-to-nation relations within Canada.

This is the recipe for peace, and for real economic and social recovery for working people in Canada.

But it won’t come without a fight that the labor and people’s movements must take on now.

There is no time to lose.

This article originally appeared in People’s Voice.


Elizabeth Rowley
Elizabeth Rowley

Elizabeth Rowley is a politician, writer, and political activist. Elected as the first woman to lead the Communist Party of Canada, Rowley has been active in the fight for public education and healthcare, local democracy, and for labor and civil rights. She writes for People's Voice, Canada's leading socialist newspaper.