Standing Rock: Tribes await court ruling due August 10
Heavy equipment at a site where sections of the Dakota Access pipeline were being buried near the town of St. Anthony in Morton County, N.D. in 2016. American Indian tribes who are still fighting the Dakota Access oil pipeline in court are once again awaiting a decision from Judge Boasberg. | Tom Stromme / The Bismarck Tribune via AP

Expect another ruling by the infamous U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., in the ongoing Standing Rock struggle by August 10, according to the latest court schedule.

This baneful jurist will be deciding whether the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers adequately considered the detrimental effects on the Standing Rock Sioux and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribes of the approval of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL).

Just to recount the basic facts in this sordid political drama, DAPL is owned by Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) and has been operational since June 2017. President Trump unabashedly pushed for permit approval over the vehement, demonstrative objections of the tribes, environmentalists, and their supporters worldwide.

The Native nations involved maintained that the pipeline would pollute a sacred waterway, the Missouri River, endangering their health and well-being and that it violated long-established tribal sovereignty.

Trump alleged DAPL was needed for domestic energy production, despite the undisputed fact that the oil—all of it—was slated for export to increase the profits accruing to ETP.

The Standing Rock Sioux and the Cheyenne River Sioux sued the Corps of Engineers soon after the pipeline was approved, contending that the tribes had not been properly consulted. Despite an abundance of legal setbacks from Boasberg, the tribes are still hopeful that he will suspend DAPL operations.

Check out previous People’s World coverage of Judge Boasberg’s rulings on DAPL.

The struggle to block the pipeline culminated in a several months’ long standoff with authorities in North Dakota more than a year ago that resulted in hundreds of arrests, violations of human rights, and serious injuries for many protesters at the hands of law enforcement. Supporters came from around the world to support the Standing Rock opposition.

The prosecution of Indigenous demonstrators is ongoing by governmental authorities. Reportedly, Natives charged with offenses are receiving inordinately long prison sentences.

The tribes maintain that legally, under the 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie between the Sioux Nation and the United States, the federal government recognized the Black Hills of the then-Dakota Territory as part of the Great Sioux Reservation and that this included the land on which DAPL was built. According to tribal claims, under this treaty the land was never ceded to the United States.

Once again, the ball is in Judge Boasberg’s court. Will this jurist again be wearing a jersey under his judicial robes emblazoned with the letters ETP?


CONTRIBUTOR

Albert Bender
Albert Bender

Albert Bender is a Cherokee activist, historian, political columnist, and freelance reporter for Native and Non-Native publications. He was an organizer and delegate to the First and Second Intercontinental Indian Conferences held in Quito, Ecuador and Quetzaltenango, Guatemala. Recently, he has been an active participant and reporter in the Standing Rock struggle in North Dakota. He is an attorney and is currently writing a legal treatise on Native American sovereignty. He is also writing a book on the war crimes committed by the U.S. against the Maya people in the Guatemalan civil war of the late 20th century. He is also the recipient of several Eagle Awards by the Tennessee Native American Eagle Organization and a former Director of Native American Legal Departments and a Tribal Public Defender.

Comments

comments

MOST POPULAR