Tax wealth not work!


Tax Day demonstrations took place by the hundreds this week from one end of the nation to the other.

On Wednesday morning, at one of these actions in California, David Watson, a member of Patriotic Millionaires, told a rally of union members and community activists that the tax system in this country is designed to give him breaks that he hasn't asked for and that he doesn't need. "We're supposed to have a progressive tax rate in this country," he declared to the cheers of the hundreds listening to him. "We don't."

It was much the same all over the rest of the country this week with the AFL-CIO, Move On and many other members of the 99% Spring Coalition demanding taxes on wealth, not on work. They demanded that the 1% and corporations pay their fair share. They rejected wholesale the basic premise of the Republican-Romney-Ryan budget that instead gives millionaires and huge corporations more tax breaks than they already have and workers higher taxes than they now pay.

The Tax Day actions mark a big victory for labor and all of its progressive allies. They have succeeded in taking the issue of taxes away from the tea baggers and the rest of the right-wing Republican cabal that too often used the issue in a demagogic way to blast "big government" and any other force that has the ability to devote resources to meeting the needs of the people, rather than those of the rich.

The tea-party "taxpayer" parades of two years ago look pathetic when stacked up against today's uprising by the majority for fairness in taxation. The Tax Day actions of this week approached the issue of taxes from the point of view of the working-class majority, not from the point of view of a selfish 1% minority.

We congratulate everyone who came out in force this week. As a result of these actions lawmakers are going to have to pay attention to what matters. They are going to have to invest in jobs, in the schools, in the infrastructure and they are going to have to take care of the working-class majority they were elected to represent. Their argument that these things can't be afforded has been rejected by the majority.

During the height of the Great Depression the money was found to build the Empire State Building, roads, tunnels, dams and enormous bridges, all with beneficial effects for the entire nation. During the current economic disaster the people are saying they expect no less and that it is up to their lawmakers to act.

Photo: During an Occupy Dallas tax day protest outside the Citigroup shareholders meeting, April 17, in Dallas. LM Otero/AP


Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • I know that this issue has been decided by the Supreme Court, but can anyone explain why money received for working at a job is income. It is a straight trade--in other words barter. My labor for your money.

    The only income is that money earned on wealth already accumulated and that income should be taxed heavily.

    Posted by Ronald Humphrey, 04/20/2012 11:32am (4 years ago)

  • If Mr. Obama were concerned about the wealth gap he would support a tax on wealth rather than higher taxes on income. A net “wealth” tax of 4.9% could replace all current federal tax revenue but the left leaning well-to-do only want to talk about raising the “income” tax rate – (so they will never pay their fair share). For example, Mr. Romney pays federal taxes of 15%, Mr. Obama pays 19% but my middle class neighbors pay about 28% when you consider a 14% payroll tax (that does not apply to most of the Obama or Romney income).

    Some wealthy individuals may be sincere in their concern about the working class tax burden but I believe they are flocking in support of the Buffet Tax just to avoid the obvious need for a tax on net wealth. Only a tax on personal wealth can permit workers to reduce their unfair burden and jump start the economy.
    Better tax reform for both individuals and business and a new definition of tax fairness can be described in one sentence. Tax individual and corporate income at a flat 8% rate (with no deductions, credits or loopholes), tax individual net wealth at 2% (excluding $15,000 cash and retirement funds) and impose a 4% Value Added Sales Tax (VAT) on business.
    The 2-4-8 Tax Blend has the lowest rates and will produce about $500 billion more than current federal revenue with no need for payroll, estate, and capital gains taxes or deferral of foreign income.
    Under the 2-4-8 Tax Blend Mr. Obama would pay $5,000 more in taxes and Mr. Romney would pay $2,446,000 more. Sound fair?
    If adopted, congress would be free to focus on better spending, a balanced budget and how best to help the states.
    Eugene Patrick Devany, JD, MPA
    home of the 2-4-8 Tax Blend

    Posted by Eugene Patrick Devany, 04/18/2012 6:37pm (4 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments